The two b-roll problems: storage and placement

B-roll wastes your time in two different ways, and most tools only think about one. The first is just finding it. Your footage is scattered across the camera roll, a cloud folder, an old downloads pile, so every edit opens with a few minutes of digging, and you forget half of what you own. Wavcut keeps a real library inside the editor, so the clip you need is where you are already working.

The second is the placing itself: picking the cut-in point, dragging the clip down, trimming it, sliding it until it hits the right word. That is the part that stacks up, because you repeat it for every cutaway in every video. Wavcut does that first pass for you and then gets out of the way so you can adjust.

Automatic placement, then you tweak

This is not "let the app make the video." A machine picking every cutaway with no taste is how you get generic. The point is narrower: skip the assembly, keep the judgment. Wavcut lays b-roll in at reasonable spots and hands you a rough cut, and every one of those choices is yours to swap, move, or delete.

Stack it with the silence cuts and captions and one pass gives you the whole skeleton: tight pacing, subtitles on, b-roll placed. All that is left is a skim and a few tweaks, which is what turns "I should edit that clip" into a posted video the same evening instead of next week.

Consistency through presets

How much b-roll you like, and how often it cuts in, is a taste you have already decided. So save it, in the same preset that holds your caption look and your silence sensitivity. Every new video then inherits the whole style in one tap, and your channel looks like one channel instead of fifty separate experiments.

It all stays on the phone. Your b-roll and your footage never leave the device, so there is no upload, no round-trip to a server, and the entire shoot-edit-post loop happens on the one thing you filmed with.